New Page 1

 Monday, December 05, 2005

American Foreign Policy Held Hostage by Israel's Nuclear Arsenal and Christian Fundamentalist Beliefs


Read here original article in "Global Gulag"

You don’t have to be a follower of Cyrus Scofield to be duped into believing that the rogue nation of Israel is Zion.

All those ‘faithfully challenged’ love their celebrated Dispensationalist Saint.

Newscompass Note:
is born out of the restless religious environment in England and Ireland in the 1820s, it was rooted in the Plymouth Brethren movement, especially the teachings of John Nelson Darby (1800-1882). The Plymouth Brethren (Darby in particular) developed some unique ideas regarding the interpretation of Scripture while emphasizing prophecy and the second coming of Christ. The theology of this movement became known as "dispensationalism".

This new teaching first spread in America through prophecy conferences such as the Niagara Bible Conferences (1883-1897). The network of related institutes that soon sprang up became the nucleus for the spread of American dispensationalism. Read
here for more on "Dispensationalism"

But what about the remaining secular nut cases that run to the defense of that despotic state that claims to be a democracy?

“O, woe is me, To have seen what I have seen, see what I see!” – yes we are all Hamlets when it come to being exploited by the propagandists of perdition.

Seymour M. Hersh in his book " The Samson Option: Israel's Nuclear Arsenal and American Foreign Policy " makes a compelling case that the steady and clandestine growth of an Israeli nuclear industry proved so successful that Israel was able to coerce several U.S. administrations into doing its bidding.

“Once Israel had the Bomb, they are in a position to bring it all down on everyone if ever they feel cornered.

It's the ultimate in Israeli security as a nation-state, if not for the security of humankind.

Israel used nuclear blackmail to force Kissinger and Nixon to airlift supplies during the 1973 Yom Kippur war, and they passed U.S. secrets collected by Jonathan Pollard to the USSR when it served their interests.”

Colonel Warner D. “Rocky” Farr in his exhaustive report -" The Third Temple's Holy of Holies: Israel's Nuclear Weapons " – makes the following assessments for the use of such weapons:

    1. To deter a large conventional attack
    2. To deter all levels of unconventional (chemical, biological, nuclear) attacks,
    3. To preempt enemy nuclear attacks,
    4. To support conventional preemption against enemy nuclear assets,
    5. To support conventional preemption against enemy non-nuclear
    6. (conventional, chemical, biological) assets,
    7. For nuclear warfighting, The “Samson Option” (last resort destruction)

He continues and cites several sources:

“Israel is a nation with a state religion, but its top leaders are not religious Jews.

The intricacies of Jewish religious politics and rabbinical law do affect their politics and decision processes.

In Jewish law, there are two types of war, one obligatory and mandatory (milkhemet mitzvah) and the one authorized but optional (milkhemet reshut).

The labeling of Prime Minister Begin's “Peace for Galilee” operation as a milchemet brera (“war of choice”) was one of the factors causing it to lose support.

Interpretation of Jewish law concerning nuclear weapons does not permit their use for mutual assured destruction. However, it does allow possession and threatening their use, even if actual use is not justifiable under the law.

Interpretations of the law allow tactical use on the battlefield, but only after warning the enemy and attempting to make peace.

How much these intricacies affect Israeli nuclear strategy decisions is unknown.”

Well, is there any doubt that the NeoCon choir back in the U S of A advocate preemptive enemy attacks and support conventional preemption against enemy non-nuclear (conventional, chemical, biological) assets?

Have any of these pro Zionists even ruled out the nuke as an appropriate stick? Hell no, they even have their own plans to vaporize all those Iranian caves.

Carol Moore a libertarian pacifist offers this viewpoint:

“The United States government and foreign policy under George W. Bush is run by neoconservatives tightly linked to Israel's right wing Likud Party and to Christian Zionists who believe an expansionist Israel will cause an apocalypse which will bring back Jesus (and he'll promptly kill all the Jews who don't convert!).

Both groups desire to re-make the Middle East, in large part to make it safer for Israel to keep and even expand its illegally occupied land. And the Democrats aren't much better.”

But what about the ordinary rank and file Americans who support Israel?

MS. Moore continues:

“The Israelis are supported and egged on in their expansionism and intransigence by the "Armageddon Lobby," thirty million "Christian Zionists" who believe Israel must expand to its Biblical borders in order to bring on Armageddon and the return of Jesus Christ.

Many believe they will be "taken" to heaven before they have to suffer in the nuclear apocalypse that follows, some that they will be among the select few raised from the dead.

Of course, all believe that all Jews who do not convert to Jesus will perish. Some believe that two-thirds of Jews must die for prophecy to be fulfilled.

Those right wing expansionist Jews who recognize the Biblical reasons for Christian Zionist's real fervor ignore the obvious anti-semitism of their religious views as long as it serves Israel's purposes.”

Current events has the Labor Party stalwart Shimon Peres throwing his support behind Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's new Kadima ‘forward’ party.

No more Likud Party for the “Butcher of Sabra And Chatila”. Likudnicks’ must be in shock!

Surely the man of war has not really turned into a kosher unleavened bread substitute of a transubstantiation savior?

How many misguided trolls from the Amen ‘Christian Zionists’ Corner will rally to the cause of peace as the plow shears are sharpened for the inevitable long awaited Armageddon?

Now don’t misinterpret the historic reality that the powers in the New World Order are bent on a final showdown.

Man is right on track doing a fine job at mutually assured extinction. But why guarantee the Talmud adaptation for the end of the human condition?

Just apply simple common sense to the politics of end-times tribulation. Christian eschatology of the final events and ultimate purposes of the world isn’t written in Hebrew. And it certainly is not dependent upon an Israel-First foreign policy.

There can be no serious debate whether United States policy is designed and blessed by orthodox factions. It is a fact.

Acknowledging the nature of American betrayal is the political gospel that needs to be preached.
The esteem and erudite Jimmy Cantrell concludes his essay America - The Whore of Babylon with,

“Yes, America is a religion, and that makes it a rival of Christianity.

Worse is that most professed Christians, their ancestors - regardless of specific ethnicity and theology - having been assimilated to Yankee ways, are driven by the Anglo-Saxon Puritan ethos and thus are promoting the heresy in either its liberal form [Multiculturalism] or its conservative form [Neocon Empire to bring the saving grace of democracy to the world.]

It is impossible to rectify the wrong if we continue to laud and emulate Puritans.”

The Puritanism that Mr. Cantrell condemns is nowadays superseded with a loathsome homage to a false Zion.

While not mutually exclusive, the religion of U.S. foreign policy has become a ritual of Talmudic torment.

The horror of Armageddon could not take place without the satanic implementation of an injurious USrael twisted policy. If dying for Israel is disturbing, save yourself and cast off this heretic form of national consciousness.

The nature of the sickness that underpins Zionism is a prime cause for a chaotic world.

Hastening a nuclear doom for the glory of the Third Temple is psychotic, unwarranted and certainly un-American.

  Go to Latest Posting

Comments 0