New Page 1


   
 Thursday, April 27, 2006

Commentary: A Lobby for Israel is an Israel Lobby, and It Exists in the US

  by

Molly Ivins
(Molly Ivins is the former editor of the liberal monthly The Texas Observer. She is the bestselling author of several books including Who Let the Dogs In? )

Other Breaking News

  • IRAQ: A man believed to be al-Qaida's leader in Iraq, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, yesterday showed his face publicly for the first time since the insurgency began three years ago.In a video posted on the internet, he spoke directly to camera. Dressed in black and his chest covered with ammunition pouches, he made an appeal to Iraqi Sunnis to support his fight against the US-led coalition and its Iraqi supporters.He was shown striding through the desert with a group of men, all dressed in black and waving automatic rifles. He was also shown firing one of the weapons.Read here for more

  • SRI LANKA: Sri Lanka's military unleashed air strikes and mortar attacks Wednesday at areas controlled by Tamil Tiger insurgents, who said that 15,000 people had fled the second day of violence sparked by a suspected rebel suicide bombing.European monitors said the violence – launched in response to a suicide bombing on Tuesday – violates a four-year-old ceasefire.The rebels said at least 12 people in its territory had been killed in attacks that the military launched Tuesday in the first major military assault since the ceasefire. Read here for more

  • EGYPT:Two suicide bombers blew themselves up on Wednesday near a base of the Multinational Force and Observers (MFO) in Al-Gurah in Egypt's Sinai Peninsula, the official MENA news agency reported. Initial reports said that the two suicide bombers were killed, said MENA. Governor of North Sinai governorate was quoted as saying that the incident occurred at 10: 30 a.m. (0830 GMT) near the camp. The pan-Arab al-Jazeera TV channel reported earlier that the bombing injured two peacekeeping soldiers. Al-Gurah is located about 30 km southeast of Al-Arish on the Mediterranean coast of the peninsula. The bombing came two days after deadly bombings in the popular Sinai resort of Dahab, which killed at least 23 people and injured dozens of others. This was the second such attack against the base in less than 10 months. Read here for more

  • IRAN: Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said Wednesday that if the United States attacks Iran, U.S. interests around the world would be harmed, state-run Tehran television reported. Speaking to laborers on the occasion of the International Laborers Day, Khamenei said U.S. officials have been using threatening language against Iran for 27 years, but the Iranian nation and officials do not care about the threats. "The Iranian nation and its officials are peace-seekers and the Islamic republic would not invade anybody," the television quoted Khamenei as saying. But he added: "The Americans should know that if they invade Iran, their interests around the world would be harmed. Iran will respond twofold to any attack." Read here for more


    • Read here full article by Molly Ivins

    One of the consistent deformities in American policy debate has been challenged by a couple of professors, and the reaction proves their point so neatly it's almost funny.

    A working paper by John Mearsheimer, professor of political science at the University of Chicago, and Stephen Walt, professor of international affairs at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard, called "The Israel Lobby" was printed in the London Review of Books earlier this month.

    And all hell broke loose in the more excitable reaches of journalism and academe.

    For having the sheer effrontery to point out the painfully obvious -- that there is an Israel lobby in the United States -- Mearsheimer and Walt have been accused of being anti-Semitic, nutty and guilty of "kooky academic work."

    Alan Dershowitz, who seems to be easily upset, went totally ballistic over the mild, academic, not to suggest pretty boring article by Mearsheimer and Walt, calling them "liars" and "bigots."

    Of course there is an Israeli lobby in America -- its leading working group is the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC).

    It calls itself "America's Pro-Israel Lobby," and it attempts to influence U.S. legislation and policy.

    Several national Jewish organizations lobby from time to time. Big deal -- why is anyone pretending this non-news requires falling on the floor and howling?

    Because of this weird deformity of debate.

    In the United States, we do NOT have full-throated, full-throttle debate about Israel.

    In Israel, they have it as matter of course, but the truth is that the accusation of anti-Semitism is far too often raised in this country against anyone who criticizes the government of Israel.

    Being pro-Israel is no defense, as I long ago learned to my cost. Now I've gotten used to it.

    Jews who criticize Israel are charmingly labeled "self-hating Jews." As I have often pointed out, that must mean there are a lot of self-hating Israelis, because those folks raise hell over their own government's policies all the time.

    I don't know that I've ever felt intimidated by the knee-jerk "you're anti-Semitic" charge leveled at anyone who criticizes Israel, but I do know I have certainly heard it often enough to become tired of it.

    And I wonder if that doesn't produce the same result: giving up on the discussion.

    It's the sheer disproportion, the vehemence of the attacks on anyone perceived as criticizing Israel that makes them so odious. Mearsheimer and Walt are both widely respected political scientists -- comparing their writing to "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" is just silly.

    Several critics have pointed out some flaws in the Mearsheimer-Walt paper, including a too-broad use of the term "Israel lobby" -- those of us who are pro-Israel differ widely -- and having perhaps overemphasized the clout of the Israel lobby by ignoring the energy lobby.

    It seems to me the root of the difficulty has been Israel's inability first to admit the Palestinians have been treated unfairly and, second, to figure out what to do about it.

    Now here goes a big fat generalization, but I think many Jews are so accustomed (by reality) to thinking of themselves as victims, it is especially difficult for them to admit they have victimized others.

    But the Mearsheimer-Walt paper is not about the basic conflict, but its effect on American foreign policy, and it appears to me their arguments are unexceptional.

    Israel is the No. 1 recipient of American foreign aid, and it seems an easy case can be made that the United States has subjugated its own interests to those of Israel in the past.

    Whether you agree or not, it is a discussion well worth having and one that should NOT be shut down before it can start by unfair accusations of "anti-Semitism."

    In a very equal sense, none of this is academic.

    The Israel Lobby was overwhelmingly in favor of starting the war with Iraq and is now among the leading hawks on Iran.

    To the extent that our interests do differ from those of Israel, the matter needs to be discussed calmly and fairly.

    This is not about conspiracies or plots or fantasies or anti-Semitism -- it's about rational discussion of American interests. And, in my case, being pro-Israel.


      Go to Latest Posting

    Comments 0

    YOUR VIEWS ?
     Send This Post to a Friend ->